State of jharkhand vs ambay cements
WebState of Jharkhand Vs Ambay Cement (2005) 1 SCC 368 Kedarnath Jute Manufacturing Co. V CTO, Calcutta, (1965) 3 SCR 626 He submits that as there is no confusion in Notification No. 39 (RE- 2007)/2004-09 dated 16.10.2007 and as the importer did not open an irrevocable commercial letter of credit, the import cannot be permitted. 4.
State of jharkhand vs ambay cements
Did you know?
WebState of Jharkhand Vs. Ambay Cements, (2005)1 SCC 368 [Para 15,22,23] JUDGMENT. V. M. KANADE, J.:- By this Petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioners are seeking the following reliefs. WebJan 5, 2016 · He relied on the case law reported in State of Jharkhand Vs Ambay Cements - 2004 (178) ELT 55 (SC ). He submits that interpretation of rule has to be strictly construed …
WebNov 17, 2024 · In State of Jharkhand v. Ambay Cements, it was held that: (SCC p. 378, para 26) 26.... it is the cardinal rule of interpretation that where a statute provides that a particular thing should be done, it should be done in the manner prescribed and not in … WebOct 13, 2024 · State of Jharkhand v Ambay Cements, (2005) 1 SCC 368; ; Commissioner of Income Tax v. Ace Multi Axes Systems Ltd., 2024 (2) SCC 158; The Constitution Bench, in Commissioner. of Customs v. Dilip Kumar & Co 2024 (9) SCC 1.) and difference in character of EMPLOYER & EMPLOYEE contribution (SC Held: “..
WebIn State of Jharkhand and Others vs. Ambay Cements and Another, (2005) 1 SCC 368, it was held that "It is the cardinal rule of interpretation that where a statute provides that a particular thing should be done, it should be done in … WebMay 11, 2008 · The Supreme Court in State of Jharkhand v. Ambay Cements reported in 2005 (1) CTC 223, at Paragraph 27, held as follows: "27. Whenever the statute prescribes that a particular act is to be done in a particular manner and also lays down that failure to comply with the said requirement leads to severe consequences, such requirement would …
WebState Of Jharkhand & Ors vs Ambay Cements & Anr on 17 November, 2004 Author: . A Lakshmanan Bench: S.N. Variava, Dr. Ar. Lakshmanan, S.H. Kapadia CASE NO.: …
WebNotification was to be scrupulously followed to avail benefit of notification Court followed the judgements of State of Jharkhand & Ors vs. Ambay Cements & Anr (2004 (11) TMI 319 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ) and Mihir Textile Ltd. Vs CCE (1997 (4) TMI 75 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) - We do appreciate the difficulty of the appellant. do i have to sign up for medicare every yearWebSTATE OF JHARKHAND v. AMBAY CEMENTS , C.A. No.-007994-007994 / 2003, fairpark® / smart mobility managerWebNov 17, 2004 · The respondent herein M/s Ambay Cements, a small-scale industry having obtained temporary registration certificate from the General Manager, District Industries Centre, Dhanbad dated 5-5-2000 applied before the Joint Commissioner of Commercial … do i have to sign up for medicare if workingWebAMBAY CEMENT STATE OF JHARKHAND Vs. AMBAY CEMENT LAWS (SC)-2004-11-16 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: JHARKHAND) Decided on November 17,2004 STATE … do i have to sign up for the pact actWebJan 10, 2024 · State of Jharkhand v. Ambay Cements, 2005. In this case, it was held that the provisions of the law should be strictly constructed, it should not be let open for the court to interpret, the court cannot ignore the conditions prescribed in the provision. Wherever there is a mandatory rule it must be strictly followed, when a statute explicitly ... fair park seating chart interactiveWebNov 25, 2014 · 9. On the other hand, it is argued on behalf of the State of Jharkhand that this Court in State of M.P v. Union of India recorded an erroneous conclusion. According to the … fair park seating chartWebDec 22, 1995 · State of Jharkhand & Ors Vs. Ambay Cements & Anr, [2004] Insc 694 (17 November 2004), 2004 Latest Caselaw 653 SC Citation : 2004 Latest Caselaw 653 SC … do i have to sign w9
